Question: As per definition, Gravitational lensing refers to bending of light rays from a distant source around a massive object (Galaxy cluster) which tends to magnify the background light source. If visible light rays bend around those massive objects then X-rays, Gamma rays, UV and IR rays which forms a part of electromagnetic spectrum must also bend around those massive objects. If true, Are there any initiative to detect those distant lensed invisible objects using the space observatories(Chandra X-ray, Spitzer IR etc.)? – Vinod
Answer: Yes. In fact, just a few days ago there was a press release announcing the detection of the spin of a black hole using the gravitationally-lensed x-ray emission from a black hole in a distant quasar. Gravitational lensing has also been used to study galaxies using the Spitzer Space Telescope. In fact, as their is no wavelength dependence to the gravitational lens effect it is possible to study gravitationally-lensed objects at all wavelengths.
Question: I am a sophomore and I have been fascinated with anything about space for as long as I can remember. I’m am currently researching about the astronomy careers. I plan to be an astro geologist and I’m still not sure what this job really involves or what it takes to pursue in this career. So can anyone tell me? – Racheal
Answer: Astrogeologists, as you might expect, combine the fields of astronomy and geology to study the terrain, composition, formation, and evolution of planets, asteroids, and comets. Note that this study includes not just the planets in our solar system, but also those planets being discovered in increasing number beyond our solar system (exoplanets). As with any field that combines aspects of two different scientific disciplines, you will need to become proficient in both astronomy and geology. Many university astronomy and geology programs have researchers who work as astrogeologists, so you should have no problems pursuing this field in college. For general information about careers in astronomy see the related postings in the archives of this blog.
Question: Hi! My name is Natasha and I live in New Jersey and am 17 years old. I am currently a Senior in high school and I’m planning on pursuing Astronomy and Physics in my future. Currently, I am in a Journalism class and I am writing a feature article on the existence of extraterrestrial life. I 100% believe in life other than ours, but I need an expert’s support in my stance. What blatant proof is there that life other than ours exists and any statistics of any kind are appreciated as well! Thank you so much for your time! – Natasha
Answer: Well, the fact is that there is no evidence for the existence of living organisms such as those we find here on Earth on any other planet. As you probably know, there have been many attempts to detect the signatures of life beyond Earth, all of which have resulted in what we call a “non-detection”. These searches continue, though, through such measurements as studies of the properties of extrasolar planet, or “exoplanet”, atmospheres. These exoplanetary atmosphere studies are attempting to detect the signatures of life, otherwise known as “biosignatures”.
Question: I am interested in knowing how many solar eclipses have ever occurred in the past, and are likely to ever occur in the future based on widely accepted astronomical models. Can you also provide dates for these events? Thank you. – Randy
Answer: Listing the number of solar eclipses that have ever occurred is a bit of a tall order. There are approximately 4 or 5 solar eclipses of various types (partial, annular, penumbral, total) per year, both in the past and in the future. As for future solar eclipses, see the solar eclipse listing for the next 10 years. This site also allows one to list solar eclipses which happened as far back as 1900.
Question: How do you calculate the critical mass for a star to become a black hole? I’m an undergraduate Math major, and this is my senior thesis and I really have no idea where to start. – Lauren
Answer: An earlier post to this blog on “Properties of Stars which Result in Black Holes” provides a general overview to this question. Since the exact mass of an object like a star that must ultimately become a black hole is a function of its radius, there isn’t an exact mass above which that object must collapse to a black hole. Said another way, any object which collapses to the point where its radius is less than a certain limit must ultimately become a black hole. This radius is called the Schwarzschild radius (Rs), and it is given by the following equation:
Rs = 2MG/c^2
where M is the mass of the object, G is the gravitational constant, and c is the speed of light. If you plug in values for the constants G and c and use solar masses for M and km for Rs, this equation reduces to the following rather simple form:
Rs = 2.95*M(solar masses) km
So, for a star with the same mass as our Sun, the Schwarzschild radius is about 3 km, or about 2 miles. In general, stars with final masses in the range 2 to 3 solar masses are believed to ultimately collapse to a black hole.
Question: I’m embarrassed to ask this, as I feel after working here for so long I should already know the answer. But here it is: What are the top 3 discoveries/achievements of the VLA? And why? — Doug
Answer: As you can imagine, an actually ranking of the Very Large Array (VLA) achievements would be open to debate. Kind of “beauty in the eye of the beholder” problem. Dave Finley, NRAO Public Information Officer, provided the following links listing what NRAO believes are the VLA’s top scientific achievements:
Question: I have a question that pertains both to space and life on the ground. It is my theory that, in essence, the U.S. communications and spy satellite network could be used as a massive (about 13 billion square-mile) radio telescope array which surrounds Earth that would have sufficient resolution and sensitivity to pick up the minute bioelectromagnetic signals given off by the human brain. Could you comment on whether such a space-based radio telescope system as described would be able to pick up brain waves of us on Earth? – John
Answer: Brain waves propagate at about 0.5 to 25 Hz. You would need a radio telescope system that is capable of measuring these wavelengths, which are in fact quite low for radio telescopes. Furthermore, as the ability to distinguish one radio source from another that is nearby is a function of the spatial resolution of a radio telescope, which is proportional to the wavelength of observation divided by the average separation between the antenna array elements, the low brain wave frequency makes it effectively impossible to distinguish one source of brain waves from another. Finally, I believe that there would be many sources of emission in the 0.5 to 25 Hz range from sources other than human brains, which would present a “confusion” problem for these measurements.
Question: As per observations, most of the stars are born in clusters (i.e. in open clusters). Then why our sun is an isolated star with no companions? – Vinod
Answer: Our Sun was probably born in a group of stars, but later escaped from or simply fell-out of this group. Our Sun may have been pushed away due to an encounter with another star or a much larger object, such as a molecular cloud. Or, and this scenario is a bit more likely, our Sun simply didn’t keep pace with its birth mates. Since it takes about 135 million years for our Sun to orbit our Galaxy, small differences in the rate at which our Sun and the stars that were born with it will spread out over the 5 billion year age of our Sun. Stars travelling slightly slower than our Sun will get left behind, which those stars that are travelling slightly faster will leave our Sun in the dust (interstellar, that is). In the end, the result is a dispersed group of stars who once shared a common beginning.
Question: I’m interested in the differences and similarities between radio galaxies and quasars. Different sources say different things. Are radio galaxies just quasars with the “jets” pointed away from us, or are there other differences between them? – Steve
Answer: It turns out that even though quasars, which is short for “quasi-stellar radio source”, were first discovered as sources of radio emission that appeared to be point-like (like a “star”) in the optical, only about 10% of the known quasars today are also sources of radio emission. You can think of radio galaxies and quasars as just different kinds of galaxies. There are lots of radio galaxies, some of which are also quasars. There are also lots of quasars, only a fraction of which are also sources of radio emission.
Question: I have been hearing lately in some space documentaries that black energy, which makes the universe expand and at an increasing speed, separate and repulse objects such as galaxies from one another, am I correct? But i also heard that the Andromeda galaxy is heading straight for us and should merge with the milky way, isn’t it contradictory? Thank you in advance for taking the time. – David
Answer: I suspect that what you mean by “black energy” is really Dark Energy, which is one of several explanations for the acceleration of the expansion of the Universe. The folks at NASA have a very nice page which describes what we think Dark Energy is, which you should certainly check out. You are correct that Dark Energy is theorized to act like a repulsive force which pushes galaxies apart. As for the Andromeda galaxy’s peculiar motion toward us, this is due to the mutual gravitational pull between our galaxy and Andromeda. This is a “small-scale” affect, while the overall expansion of the Universe happens on a larger scale.